New Fee At U of M



While, this afternoon, I ran my website statistics and noticed that my University Administration, and Public Relations people were all over my website. (Between 1pm – 2:30 I had 20 visits from Admin and PR.) I was wondering what was going on?
Turns out they have imposed a new fee:

UTech Fee
The U of M has implemented a technology fee (UTech fee) starting in Summer Session 2005. The fee in Summer Session is $25 per registered student (the fee will also be applicable in regular session but at differing rates). The UTech fee will be used to upgrade building networks and equip classrooms with the latest technology, as well as install wireless networks in common areas. These upgrades will ultimately result in improved teaching and learning experiences at the University.

I have tried to find out when the Board of Governors approved this fee increase because all fee increases are supposed to be approved by the Board. I have not been able to find this. It could exist and I just could not find it. I have heard that for regular session this fee will be $110 for 30 credit hours. I do not have a solid figure has the University has not made it public on the website yet. Actually, the University went out of their way to quietly do this.
Now where do I stand on the fee?
If the University uses this fee plus the $60 extra fee for resident students to actually install internet in residence then I am in favour of it. It will be cheaper than getting a phone line and dial-up internet. Not only that, the University claims they will be using this to place wireless in common areas. But since the new wireless technology has much greater range, they should be able to make the entire campus a hot-spot. If they use the money to support Student Computing, I am in favour of it. If they use this money for Administration, then I am opposed.
What do I want the University to do?
Simple, START WORKING WITH STUDENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So many problems and concerns would be solved if they worked with students to implement things instead of trying to hide things and hope we do not notice. Come on Admin, we are your University’s students. If you do not have confidence in us, why should employees? This attempt to hide new fees is unacceptable and saddens me. I was one of the few UMSU Council members who is open to fee increases provided the increases go into things that help students. This fee appears at first glance to be good because if it is invested into student computing it will improve the campus for students. Yet the Ivory Tower (The slang term on campus for Administration since they have their own building which is on the highest point of land on campus) is trying to hide the fee which leads me to believe that it is just another cash grab.
Look, students are now going to pay an extra $2,750,000 a year plus the $60,000 that resident students will pay on top of that, students want to know where these millions of dollars are going.
So, will Administration use the money from students to benefit students? or will they use it to benefit themselves?
In summary, I am not opposed to the idea provided that it is not another cash cow for Administration but I do not trust Administration to not make it a cash cow.
On a last note, I will not be updating my blog until Saturday afternoon.

4 thoughts on “New Fee At U of M

  1. Stupid TypeKey identity isn’t working…
    Anyway, what I was going to say is that I am actually on the Senate Committee on Academic Computing, and we have not had any discussions about requiring a fee increase. Perhaps that’s not in our terms though. I wouldn’t know since we’ve never actually had a meeting in the 6 months I’ve been a part of the committee.

  2. I love how they consult with students about new fees that we’re going to have to pay. It would have been nice to hear months ago that this was on the books and here’s the projects that we have in mind for this extra 2.75 million we’re going to have each year. 2.75 million dollars buys a helluva lot of computers and related equipment, some how I don’t think we’re going to actually see much of it go towards new infrastructure. For 3 mil, you can buy 1500 new computers, or 30,000 wireless access points. Even if you figured that upgrading the associated network infrastructure would cost a few bucks, this is still a huge IT budget increase. The only thing that would convince me that this isn’t a poorly vieled money grab is if I come back to school in the fall and the entire campus is blanketed with wifi (including residences), there are a couple new computer labs, and a substantial portion of the current labs are upgraded. Over a two year period, 6 mil is enough to upgrade every computer lab on campus, so we’d better see it happening. Some information from admin would be very helpful to see where they plan to use all the cash.

  3. Dana,
    You would think that a huge fee to support Academic Computing would go to the body responsible for Academic Computing? Cause the University would not impose the largest single fee increase in U of M history without taking it through the proper governance channels? Oh wait, that just did!
    The sad part is that when the Board of Governors finds out, they will tell Administration they were bad and then turn around and make a motion to approve the fee. They will not even do research into it. We may has well have a bunch of backbench Liberal MPs on our Board of Governors for all the free thinking they do.
    Andrew,
    You forgot the extra $60 UTech fee for residence. You will be paying an extra $170 for technology (and they say that internet will not be in residence this fall as they need to do “studies” – not their exact words but the geist of it) access next year. This is on top of the 4% rent increase and the 5% meal rate increase which is on top the already highest meal cost in the country.
    But, as I said, I would be in favour of this fee if we could see the money being added to the tech budget and we could be sure that it is not another Administration money grab! For the price, they should be able to do many things but they will not. It is just another money grab. Sad is it not?

  4. Hey UofM Admin

    Since I’ve seen an influx of hits from admin in the last few days, I thought I might as well put something here for them to read! :) In response to Joey’s discovery of the new UTech fee that as far as we can tell hasn’t been approved by the board, I h…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>